View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008, 07:19 PM
lecturer lecturer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 132
Default A new suture technique for anastomosis in radical retropubic prostatectomy and ea

ads
A new suture technique for anastomosis in radical retropubic prostatectomy and early removal of urethral catheter.

INTRODUCTION: A modified suture technique for urethro-vesical anastomosis during radical retropubic prostatectomy was developed and utilized in a cohort of patients. Comparative analysis of postoperative outcome was performed with a previous group of patients who had an anastomosis with the conventional technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A consecutive group of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy in our department with the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer was included in this retrospective study. Urethro-vesical anastomosis was performed either with the new or conventional method (CM). Outcome data of these two different patient sets were compared. RESULTS: One-hundred and one consecutive patients (mean age of 61.9 years) who were operated by either one of the two anastomotic suture techniques composed our study group. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (min: 12-max: 24). Urethro-vesical "U" (UVU) suture was performed in 51 patients, and CM in 50 patients. Foley catheter was removed at postoperative fourth day in 33 (64.7%) and 18 (36%) patients in UVU and CM groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Incontinence rate was significantly lower in the UVU group at postoperative first year (p < 0.0005). Anastomotic strictures were observed in only 1.9% of the cases in UVU group, compared to 4% in CM group. CONCLUSION: Outcome data from our patient group indicate that UVU suture may allow a high quality urethro-vesical anastomosis with a very favorable outcome in terms of early catheter removal, high continence and low stricture formation rates in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Further validation of these results requires a prospective randomized trial.


Can J Urol. 2007 Dec;14(6):3734-3738

T?rkeri LN, Temiz Y, Yaz?c? CM, T?nay I.

Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
ads
Reply With Quote
 
34 35 36 37 39 40 44 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68