Medical Researches  

Go Back   Medical Researches > LOST RESEARCHES IN SOME COUNTRIES > Sweden
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 06:26 PM
diyabet diyabet is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
Default Postmortem Imaging of Blunt Chest Trauma Using CT and MRI: Comparison With Autopsy.

ads
OBJECTIVE: Postmortem examination of chest trauma is an important domain in forensic medicine, which is today performed using autopsy. Since the implementation of cross-sectional imaging methods in forensic medicine such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a number of advantages in comparison with autopsy have been described. Within the scope of validation of cross-sectional radiology in forensic medicine, the comparison of findings of postmortem imaging and autopsy in chest trauma was performed. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 24 cases with chest trauma that underwent postmortem CT, MRI, and autopsy. Two board-certified radiologists, blind to the autopsy findings, evaluated the radiologic data independently. Each radiologist interpreted postmortem CT and MRI data together for every case. The comparison of the results of the radiologic assessment with the autopsy and a calculation of interobserver discrepancy was performed. RESULTS: Using combined CT and MRI, between 75% and 100% of the investigated findings, except for hemomediastinum (70%), diaphragmatic ruptures (50%; n=2) and heart injury (38%), were discovered. Although the sensitivity and specificity regarding pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, and pericardial effusion were not calculated, as these findings were not mentioned at the autopsy, these findings were clearly seen radiologically. The averaged interobserver concordance was 90%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of our results demonstrate that postmortem CT and MRI are useful diagnostic methods for assessing chest trauma in forensic medicine as a supplement to autopsy. Further radiologic-pathologic case studies are necessary to define the role of postmortem CT and MRI as a single examination modality.

Aghayev E, Christe A, Sonnenschein M, Yen K, Jackowski C, Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R, Vock P.

*Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern †Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopedic Surgery, MEM Research Center ‡Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Inselspital §Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Sonnenhof Spital AG, Bern, Switzerland.
ads
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Böcek ilaçlama , yurt ,
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by 3.0.0

sitemap
burs , burs anadolu jet kpss , , anadolu jet ,
34 35 36 37 39 40 44 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68