Medical Researches  

Go Back   Medical Researches > LOST RESEARCHES IN SOME COUNTRIES > USA
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:33 PM
diyabet diyabet is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
Default Diagnosing Endometrial Hyperplasia: Why is it so Difficult to Agree?

ads
Current World Health Organization classification of endometrial hyperplasia is problematic because of poor diagnostic reproducibility. We sought to determine factors that cause diagnostic disagreement in a review of 2601 endometrial specimens. Blinded random specimens of normal endometrium, hyperplasias, and carcinoma were reviewed by 2 pathologists, with review by a third pathologist in cases with disagreement. All cases of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma were scored for degree of glandular crowding, architectural complexity, and cytologic atypia. Sample adequacy, hyperplasia volume, presence of metaplasia, or endometrial polyp were also scored. The overall kappa for agreement was 0.71, with a lower kappa of 0.36 when cases called ”no hyperplasia” were excluded. The percent specific agreement was 90.3% for no hyperplasia, 31.1% for simple hyperplasia, 51.1% for complex hyperplasia, 49.8% for atypical hyperplasia, and 57.5% for adenocarcinoma. Cases categorized as ”low volume hyperplasia” had more diagnostic disagreement than ”high volume,” (62% vs. 39%, P=0.003). Similarly, cases called ”scant” had more diagnostic disagreement than ”not scant” (65% vs. 57%, P=0.013). The histologic feature associated with the most diagnostic disagreement was cytologic atypia (P<0.0001). Architectural crowding, architectural complexity, or the presence of a polyp were all associated with diagnostic disagreement (P<0.0001). High diagnostic disagreement in endometrial hyperplasia is related to both sample adequacy and interpretation of histologic features present. Although obtaining additional tissue may increase diagnostic reproducibility, differences in interpretation of key histologic features like cytologic atypia remain major factors contributing to diagnostic disagreement.

Allison KH, Reed SD, Voigt LF, Jordan CD, Newton KM, Garcia RL.

Departments of *Pathology †Obstetrics and Gynecology ‡Epidemiology, University of Washington Medical Center §Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center ∥Group Health Center for Health Studies, Seattle, WA.
ads
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Böcek ilaçlama , yurt ,
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by 3.0.0

sitemap
burs , burs anadolu jet kpss , , anadolu jet ,
34 35 36 37 39 40 44 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68